Cyclone-Ready Solar Mounting Structures Designed for 70 m/s Wind Environments
Commercial and utility-scale solar projects in cyclone-prone regions face a different set of constraints compared to standard installations. High basic wind speeds, rapidly changing pressure zones, corrosive coastal environments, and limited access to sites all place significant demands on the structural system.
While modules and inverters often receive detailed technical scrutiny, mounting systems are frequently treated as a secondary consideration or selected late in the procurement cycle. In high-wind regions, this approach can lead to conservative over-design, constructability issues, or, in the worst cases, structural failure during extreme weather events.
From an engineering perspective, the mounting structure is the primary load path between the environment and the asset. If that load path is poorly defined or inadequately engineered, even well-specified electrical equipment becomes vulnerable.
This article outlines how cyclone-ready solar mounting structures are engineered by iEngineering to withstand wind speeds up to 70 m/s, with a focus on practical design decisions that matter to EPCs, developers, and technical consultants.
Key Engineering Challenges in Cyclone Regions
Wind Uplift and Pressure Zoning
Cyclonic wind loading is not uniform. Local pressure coefficients vary significantly across array edges, corners, ridges, and elevated roof zones. Inadequate zoning assumptions can result in underestimated uplift forces, especially on perimeter rows.
Engineering challenges include:
- Accurately modelling external and internal pressure coefficients.
- Accounting for dynamic wind effects rather than relying on simplified static loads.
- Managing differential uplift across interconnected module tables.
Load Transfer to Roofs or Foundations
A mounting system does not exist in isolation. Loads must be transferred safely into:
- Roof purlins, rafters, or concrete decks for rooftop systems.
- Ground foundations, piles, or ballast blocks for utility-scale systems.
Common failure points are not the steel members themselves, but fasteners, embedment depths, and interfaces between dissimilar materials.
Compatibility with Layouts and Terrain
Cyclone regions often overlap with challenging terrain:
- Uneven ground profiles.
- Variable soil classifications.
- Irregular roof geometries or aging structures.
Mounting systems must accommodate changes in tilt, span, and support spacing without forcing last-minute field modifications that compromise structural intent.
Engineering Design Approach
Design Philosophy and Standards
Cyclone-ready mounting structures are engineered using Australian and regional standards, including:
- AS/NZS wind loading standards for ultimate and serviceability limit states.
- Relevant structural steel and cold-formed steel design codes.
- Project-specific authority and insurer requirements where applicable.
Design is driven by site-specific parameters rather than generic “high-wind” assumptions.
Wind Speed Assumptions and Safety Margins
For cyclone-exposed projects, basic wind speeds up to 70 m/s are adopted based on regional wind maps and terrain categories. Engineering considerations include:
- Importance level and return period selection.
- Terrain and shielding multipliers.
- Topographic amplification where applicable.
Safety margins are applied through load combinations and capacity reduction factors, not by arbitrarily increasing steel thickness.
Solution Breakdown
Rooftop Mounting Systems
For commercial rooftops, cyclone-ready design focuses on:
- Minimising uplift forces through low-profile geometries.
- Direct load paths into primary structural members.
- Controlled spacing of anchors based on tributary areas.
Both penetrating and non-penetrating systems are assessed against roof capacity, waterproofing constraints, and maintenance access requirements. Ballasted systems are only considered where roof capacity and wind analysis clearly support their use.
Ground-Mounted Structures
Utility-scale ground systems are engineered to manage:
- High overturning moments under cyclonic uplift.
- Variable soil conditions, including soft clays and coastal sands.
- Long continuous rows with thermal and wind-induced movement.
Foundation solutions are selected based on geotechnical data, balancing constructability, corrosion risk, and long-term performance.
Adaptability Across Project Scales
The same structural principles are applied consistently across:
- Small commercial arrays.
- Large industrial rooftops.
- Multi-megawatt ground-mounted plants.
Standardised structural modules are adjusted parametrically, reducing redesign effort while maintaining compliance with site-specific loading.
Installation and Execution Considerations
Modular Design and Site Efficiency
Cyclone-rated systems are designed with modular components to:
- Reduce on-site cutting or welding.
- Maintain dimensional control across large arrays.
- Simplify quality assurance during installation.
Clear installation tolerances are defined at the design stage to avoid ambiguity in the field.
Logistics for Remote or Constrained Sites
Many cyclone-exposed projects are located in remote or island regions. Design considerations include:
- Transport constraints on member lengths and weights.
- Simplified fastener systems to reduce inventory complexity.
- Installation sequences that minimise crane or heavy equipment dependency.
Engineering decisions are validated not only for strength but also for realistic site execution.
Practical Applications and Experience
Cyclone-ready mounting systems developed by iEngineering have been applied across:
- Coastal and island solar projects.
- Industrial rooftops in high-wind zones.
- Ground-mounted arrays on variable soil profiles.
Experience across tropical, coastal, and high-exposure regions informs conservative assumptions where required and optimisation where conditions allow. Feedback from construction teams is incorporated into iterative design improvements.
Conclusion and Next Steps
In cyclone-prone environments, solar mounting structures are not secondary components. They define the survivability and insurability of the entire asset.
Key engineering takeaways include:
- Wind zoning and load paths must be explicitly engineered.
- Structural interfaces are as critical as member strength.
- Design should be driven by site data, not generic products.
For EPCs and developers working in high-wind regions, early engagement on mounting system design can significantly reduce downstream risk and rework.
If you would like to discuss project-specific wind conditions, roof constraints, or foundation challenges, the engineering team at iEngineering is available for technical discussions aligned to your project requirements.
For more details, contact us today — we’re ready to assist you!
Email: enquiries@iengaust.com.au
Visit: https://solar.ieng.tech




